A lot of philosophy and music is like math, and questions get settled by all,
104 + 196 (300) stays agreed upon.
Heidegger mostly absorbed Husserl and Sartre
and embellished it with the poetry traditions and philsophies
of where he came from.
Husserl and Sartre were more original philosphers,
Heidegger was more of an academic.
Still though,
passing it through another language and philosophic tradition
illucidates that which is discussed,.
Husserl: Consciousnessness is always ‘Consciousness of…’
there is nothing that is consciousness (:”I am my mind,.” Antonin Artaud
Husserl was Heidegger’s teacher
Sartre saw the clarity in Husserl
they were all doing great work in philosophy
and it might seem like a bunch of bull
and even though Sartre’s translations nail it down best at its core
the contribution from the mutlilanguage aspect helped
their personal and political lives aren’t represented in their key terms
husserl phenomenology
sartre existentialism
heidegger ‘consciousness is an infusion of nothingness in Being’
except thats really Husserl
dasein as the for itself is like good primitive Swift
Could any of them have reversed history?
but the pure math of it, Being presupposes Non-Being,
it wouldn’t exist otherwise, wouldn’t differentiate
non-Being becomes a kind of all encompassing sobriquet
hard to imagine, but apparently here as there wouldn’t be any place
for Being to be
cabala of math
the ramifications of math at least
if there is 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 and 1 0 and 1 1 = 0
it’s only philosophy and math
non-heroic
Leave a comment