we are all living beings on a pure planet in space
and fundamentally thus have rights to our only planet
transcending all nations and international organizations of any kind
we permit governments if they are useful
to the extent we do
but living on our individual planet remains primary
how it translates to relations with govts
and powers that be is governments
and criminal organizations and corporations,
and stray intruders all, have no right of any kind
to put people in impossible situations,
from out of that flows billions in social spending
to address basic rights
and a warding off of all intimidation
pure being as a right of all, one person one planet
governments have to be useful or the¥ åre nothing – nothing
So displeased with wordpress, the uncontactable non relational entity.
Their website says that if the new superloader of photos drag and drop style
doesn’t work with the browser I have, it would automatically default
to the old photo loader that worked fine. It does not. And I’ve felt
like a loser for months now unable to continue the infinite oversion
in wordpress,.if it was deliberate, which i doubt, otherwise just know
the new drag and drop photo system and other infrastructure sucks it does
no thanks the new system – profit for you, garbage for us
fix the default or aphitizay bogus impositionalist
Comment by oversion — January 5, 2013 @ 3:55 pm
I feel justified in viewing govt like admin as support staff
rather than as all powerful superjustified deities of any sort.
The reason I find that supposition sound is that government is
an option for humanity, specifically, a collective approach to things,
people banding together to fulfill functions that can be better served that way
than by every individual household having to include several teachers,
a doctor and nurse, fire equipment, and the wherewithal to take on marauders.
The origin of government creates a sizeable misimpression.
The old royalties and Nero’s and Caeser’s and Pharaoh’s were
operating out of the individual household model, the largest and richest
becoming however dominant they did, as to form mini countries (like Barlowland)
with the worst evolving to criminal pirate status, raiding other lands for valuables.
Caeser’s gangster culture a rude rag however much it resembled a government
or blandished itself with glories. It was simply violently imposed like any crime.
But that example has weighed on the sick minds in government ever since
as a disgusting mirage of what government must be like.
What it is however is simply collectively addressed tasks shared out
with everyone chipping in on it more or less. (Or giving their money to
crazy politicized churches or hiding it in offshore accounts.)
The government is us, choosing to collectively function.
Governments are thus inherantly socialist or communist.
Even including right wing governments, with the extreme right model
of collectively addressing only issues of defense and security.
That is still either socialism or communism. They talk like there’s
something other than collective activity that a government can engage in
but it’s an oxymoron. The alternative way is, if you can’t afford a military yourself
you don’t have one. Put out your own fires, quarantine yourself if sick, (like cats do)
take your garbage somewhere no one will kill you for leaving it,
all of which, as america’s right seems to favour, meaning if you are
rich with a lot of land and a big extended family, you can set up all that
and everyone else goes begging.
To leap from there, this almost becomes the critic justifying the state.
The right wing wants the state to serve only the rich whom in some instances
pay for more of it. But we remind them that government and collective activity
are options, and that the world divied up variously is only a fruit of the option.
It’s nothing if not agreed to, and the agreement is not an easy one.
It includes accepting that you have what you have, an apartment say
while someone else owns land and buildings that could accomodate thousands.
Thats a big thing to agree to, predicated on the government and valuative system
doing something of value, in the circumstances, greater than if it didn’t exist.
If they make it serve only the rich, it crashes. They might have enough
money to hire enough people to maintain themselves during the good times,
but once a Caeser or Hitler is out of power you don’t find many believing in them
as gods heros governments nor even as administrators. They become nothing.
They are essentially fired into oblivion and gone for the rest of time.
Comment by oversion — January 7, 2013 @ 2:32 pm